Pedosphere 31(2): 289--302, 2021
ISSN 1002-0160/CN 32-1315/P
©2021 Soil Science Society of China
Published by Elsevier B.V. and Science Press
Nutrient cycling and greenhouse gas emissions from soil amended with biochar-manure mixtures
Carlos M. ROMERO1,2, Chunli LI1,2, Jen OWENS1, Gabriel O. RIBEIRO3, Tim A. MCALLISTER1, Erasmus OKINE2, Xiying HAO1
1Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge Research and Development Centre, Lethbridge, Alberta T1J 4B1(Canada)
2Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Arts&Sciences, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Alberta T1K 3M4(Canada)
3Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 5A8(Canada)
ABSTRACT
      Integrating biochar into cattle diets has recently emerged as a potential management practice for improving on-farm productivity. Yet, information concerning the cycling of biochar-manure mixtures is scarce. A 70-d incubation experiment was conducted within two surface (0-15 cm) Mollisols with contrasting textures, i.e., sandy clay loam (Raymond) and clayey (Lethbridge), to evaluate the effects of biochar (3 Mg ha-1) on cumulative greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and related fertility attributes in the presence or absence of cattle manure (120 Mg ha-1). Five treatments were included:i) non-amended soil (control, CK), ii) soil amended with pinewood biochar (B), iii) soil amended with beef cattle manure (M) (manure from cattle on a control diet), iv) soil amended with biochar-manure (BM) (manure from cattle on a control diet, with pinewood biochar added at 20 g kg-1 of diet dry matter), and v) soil amended with B and M at the aforementioned rates (B+M). A total of 40 soil columns were prepared and incubated at 21℃ and 60%-80% water-holding capacity. On average, total CO2 fluxes increased by 2.2-and 3.8-fold under manure treatments (i.e., M, BM, and B+M), within Raymond and Lethbridge soils, respectively, relative to CK and B. Similarly, total CH4 fluxes were the highest (P < 0.05) in Raymond soil under B+M and BM relative to CK and B, and in Lethbridge soil under M and BM relative to CK and B. In Lethbridge soil, application of BM increased cumulative N2O emissions by 1.8-fold relative to CK. After 70-d incubation, amendment with BM increased (P < 0.05) PO4-P and NO3-N + NH4-N availability in Raymond and Lethbridge soils compared with B. A similar pattern was observed for water-extractable organic carbon in both soils, with BM augmenting (P < 0.05) the occurrence of labile carbon over CK and B. It can be concluded that biochar, manure, and/or biochar-manure have contrasting short-term effects on the biogeochemistry of Mollisols. At relatively low application rates, biochar does not necessarily counterbalance manure-derived inputs. Although BM did not mitigate the flux of GHGs over M, biochar-manure has the potential to recycle soil nutrients in semiarid drylands.
Key Words:  animal husbandry,black carbon,carbon dioxide,methane,Orthic Black Chernozem,soil fertility
Citation: Romero C M, Li C L, Owens J, Ribeiro G O, McAllister T A, Okine E, Hao X Y. 2021. Nutrient cycling and greenhouse gas emissions from soil amended with biochar-manure mixtures. Pedosphere. 31(2):289-302.
View Full Text



Copyright © 2024 Editorial Committee of PEDOSPHERE. All rights reserved.
Address: P. O. Box 821, 71 East Beijing Road, Nanjing 210008, China    E-mail: pedosphere@issas.ac.cn
Technical support: Beijing E-Tiller Co.,Ltd.