Elsevier

Pedosphere

Volume 32, Issue 3, June 2022, Pages 452-462
Pedosphere

CO2 emission and source partitioning from carbonate and non-carbonate soils during incubation

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(21)60011-5Get rights and content

ABSTRACT

The accurate quantification and source partitioning of CO2 emitted from carbonate (i.e., Haplustalf) and non-carbonate (i.e., Hapludult) soils are critically important for understanding terrestrial carbon (C) cycling. The two main methods to capture CO2 released from soils are the alkali trap method and the direct gas sampling method. A 25-d laboratory incubation experiment was conducted to compare the efficacies of these two methods to analyze CO2 emissions from the non-carbonate and carbonate-rich soils. An isotopic fraction was introduced into the calculations to determine the impacts on partitioning of the sources of CO2 into soil organic carbon (SOC) and soil inorganic carbon (SIC) and into C3 and/or C4 plant-derived SOC. The results indicated that CO2 emissions from the non-carbonate soil measured using the alkali trap and gas sampling methods were not significantly different. For the carbonate-rich soil, the CO2 emission measured using the alkali trap method was significantly higher than that measured using the gas sampling method from the 14th day of incubation onwards. Although SOC and SIC each accounted for about 50% of total soil C in the carbonate-rich soil, SOC decomposition contributed 57%–72% of the total CO2 emitted. For both non-carbonate and carbonate-rich soils, the SOC derived from C4 plants decomposed faster than that originated from C3 plants. We propose that for carbonate soil, CO2 emission may be overestimated using the alkali trap method because of decreasing CO2 pressure within the incubation jar, but underestimated using the direct gas sampling method. The gas sampling interval and ambient air may be important sources of error, and steps should be taken to mitigate errors related to these factors in soil incubation and CO2 quantification studies.

Section snippets

INTRODUCTION

Soil is the largest carbon (C) pool on the earth, with an organic carbon (OC) stock of 1 550 Pg and an inorganic carbon (IC) stock of 950 Pg (Lal, 2007). In arid and semi-arid regions, which occupy a total land area of 4.9 × 107 km2 (Lardner et al., 2015), the soil inorganic carbon (SIC) stock is approximately 10 times greater than that of soil organic carbon (SOC) (Schlesinger, 1982). The SIC and SOC pools play a significant role in global C sequestration (Lal, 2009). Because SIC significantly

Incubation experiment

Two types of soils, carbonate and non-carbonate soils, were used for this experiment. The carbonate-rich soil was collected in Shanxi Province in northwestern China (34°17′59.317″ N, 108°04′9.384″ E), at the southern edge of the Loess Plateau. This region is in a warm temperate zone with a semi-humid and semi-arid climate and an average annual temperature and precipitation of 13 °C and 600–650 mm, respectively. The soil is classified as Eum-Orthic Anthrosol in Chinese Soil Taxonomy, equivalent

Soil C contents, pH and δ13C values

The C contents, δ13C values, and pH differed significantly between Hapludult (non-carbonate soil) and Haplustalf (carbonate-rich soil) (Table I). The pH of Hapludult (7.2 ± 0.2) was significantly lower than that of Haplustalf (7.8 ± 0.2). The TC content of Hapludult was 10.3 ± 0.1 g kg-1, of which 99% was SOC. In contrast, the TC content of Haplustalf was 17.1 ± 0.1 g kg-1, comprising about 50% SOC and 50% SIC. The δ13C value of TC (δ13CTC, −20.6‰ ± 0.1‰) in Hapludult was significantly lower

CONCLUSIONS

Both alkali trap and gas sampling methods can be used to quantify CO2 emissions from soils in incubation studies. For the carbonate soil, the alkali trap method may overestimate the CO2 emissions due to decreasing CO2 pressure within the incubation jar, while the direct gas sampling method may underestimate CO2 emissions. It was found that longer sampling intervals resulted in greater differences in measured CO2 values between the two gas collection methods. Interference from ambient air was a

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2016YFD0201200) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 31370527, 31261140367, and 30870414). The first author would like to acknowledge the Chinese Scholarship Council (No. 201706350210) for the support of the work.

References (60)

  • B Mary et al.

    Use ofr 13C variations at natural abundance for studying the biodegradation of root mucilage, roots and glucose in soil

    Soil Biol Biochem

    (1992)
  • P Rovira et al.

    Changes in δ13C composition of soil carbonates driven by organic matter decomposition in a Mediterranean climate: A field incubation experiment

    Geoderma

    (2008)
  • B A Stevenson et al.

    Effluxed CO2-13C from sterilized and unsterilized treatments of a calcareous soil

    Soil Biol Biochem

    (2006)
  • J Szaran

    Achievement of carbon isotope equilibrium in the system HCO3- (solution)-CO2 (gas)

    Chem Geol

    (1997)
  • M von Lützow et al.

    SOM fractionation methods: Relevance to functional pools and to stabilization mechanisms

    Soil Biol Biochem

    (2007)
  • W Amelung et al.

    Natural 13C abundance: A tool to trace the incorporation of dung-derived carbon into soil particle-size fractions

    Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom

    (1999)
  • T Anan et al.

    Real time monitoring of gases emitted from soils using a multi-turn time-of-flight mass spectrometer “MULTUM-S II”

    Environ Sci Processes Impacts

    (2014)
  • D D Baldocchi et al.

    Measuring biosphere-atmosphere exchanges of biologically related gases with micrometeorological methods

    Ecology

    (1988)
  • J Balesdent et al.

    Effect of tillage on soil organic carbon mineralization estimated from 13C abundance in maize fields

    J Soil Sci

    (1990)
  • R Bol et al.

    Short-term N2O, CO2, NH3 fluxes, and N/C transfers in a Danish grass-clover pasture after simulated urine deposition in autumn

    J Plant Nutr Soil Sci

    (2004)
  • B Boström et al.

    Isotope fractionation and 13C enrichment in soil profiles during the decomposition of soil organic matter

    Oecologia

    (2007)
  • D O Breecker et al.

    Minor stable carbon isotope fractionation between respired carbon dioxide and bulk soil organic matter during laboratory incubation of topsoil

    Biogeochemistry

    (2015)
  • S Bruun et al.

    Carbon dioxide emissions from biochar in soil: Role of clay, microorganisms and carbonates

    Eur J Soil Sci

    (2014)
  • G A Buyanovsky et al.

    Soil respiration in a winter wheat ecosystem

    Soil Sci Soc Am J

    (1986)
  • W X Cheng

    Measurement of rhizosphere respiration and organic matter decomposition using natural 13C

    Plant Soil

    (1996)
  • R T Conant et al.

    Environmental factors controlling soil respiration in three semiarid ecosystems

    Soil Sci Soc Am J

    (2000)
  • Y J Dong et al.

    Effects of moisture and carbonate additions on CO2 emission from calcareous soil during closed-jar incubation

    J Arid Land

    (2014)
  • K Ekschmitt et al.

    Soil-carbon preservation through habitat constraints and biological limitations on decomposer activity

    J Plant Nutr Soil Sci

    (2008)
  • K Y Fa et al.

    Abiotic carbonate dissolution traps carbon in a semiarid desert

    Sci Rep

    (2016)
  • S Haile-Mariam et al.

    Fractionation and long-term laboratory incubation to measure soil organic matter dynamics

    Soil Sci Soc Am J

    (2008)
  • Cited by (3)

    • Declining total carbon stocks in carbonate-containing agricultural soils over a 62-year recultivation chronosequence under humid conditions

      2022, Geoderma
      Citation Excerpt :

      The topsoil SIC loss (0.61 Mg C ha−1 y−1) in this reclaimed arable land in Germany exceeds values measured for carbonate-containing agricultural soils in China; although, China is recognized as a country with high N fertilizer application rates (Potter et al., 2010) that are at least 2–3 times those in Germany (Löw et al., 2021). We speculate that there are two main reasons for this: (1) the SIC content in the arable soil in our study was twice that at the beginning of restoration in Chinese carbonate soils (∼6–8 g C kg−1 soil) (Bughio et al., 2015; Bughio et al., 2017; Zhao et al., 2022); and (2) in the arid and semi-arid regions of China, part of the CO2 produced after carbonate decomposition will be bound again in the form of PIC (Bughio et al., 2015; Entry et al., 2004; Sahrawat, 2003). However, in our study, almost all of the carbonate present in the surface soil of the reclaimed arable land was decomposed to CO2 and released to the atmosphere.

    View full text