Elsevier

Pedosphere

Volume 28, Issue 3, June 2018, Pages 430-442
Pedosphere

Soil Hydraulic Properties: Influence of Tillage and Cover Crops

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(17)60387-4Get rights and content

Abstract

Understanding the effects of cover crops and tillage on soil physical properties is important for determining soil productivity. This study was conducted at Lincoln University's Freeman Center, USA to evaluate the effects of tillage and cover crop management on soil hydraulic properties. The field site included three replicate blocks in a randomized complete block design with each plot measuring 21.3 m in length and 12.2 m in width. Treatment factors were tillage at two levels (moldboard plow tillage vs. no tillage) and cover crop at two levels (cereal rye (Secale cereal) cover crop vs. no cover crop). Soil samples were collected in late spring/early summer from each treatment at 10-cm depth increments from the soil surface to a depth of 40 cm using cores (76.2-mm diameter and 76.2-mm length). Soil bulk density was 13% lower with tillage compared with no-tillage. Volumetric water content was significantly higher at 0.0 and −0.4 kPa pressures with tillage compared with no tillage. Tillage increased the proportion of coarse mesopores by 32% compared with no tillage, resulting in 87% higher saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ksat). Cover crop increased the proportion of macropores by 24% compared with no cover crop; this can potentially increase water infiltration and reduce runoff. As a result of higher macroporosity, Ksat was higher under cover crop compared with no cover crop. This study demonstrated that tillage can benefit soil hydraulic properties in the short term, but these effects may not persist over time. Cover crops may slightly improve soil hydraulic properties, but longer term studies are needed to evaluate the long-term effects.

References (49)

  • J A Osunbitan et al.

    Tillage effects on bulk density, hydraulic conductivity and strength of a loamy sand soil in southwestern Nigeria

    Soil Till Res

    (2005)
  • M Pagliai et al.

    Effects of tillage on porosity and microstructure of a loam soil

    Soil Technol

    (1989)
  • M C Sasal et al.

    Soil porosity characteristics and water movement under zero tillage in silty soils in Argentinian Pampas

    Soil Till Res

    (2006)
  • G P Sparling et al.

    Importance of soil water content when estimating soil microbial C, N and P by the fumigation-extraction methods

    Soil Biol Biochem

    (1989)
  • R T Walczak et al.

    Modeling of soil water retention curve using soil solid phase parameters

    J Hydrol

    (2006)
  • L Abdollahi et al.

    Tillage system and cover crop effects on soil quality: II. Pore characteristics

    Soil Sci Soc Am J

    (2014)
  • L R Ahuja et al.

    Changes in soil water retention curves due to tillage and natural reconsolidation

    Soil Sci Soc of Am J

    (1998)
  • S H Anderson et al.

    Soil physical properties after 100 years of continuous cultivation

    J Soil Water Conserv

    (1990)
  • A C Auler et al.

    Soil physico-hydrical properties resulting from the management in Integrated Production Systems

    Rev Ciênc Agron

    (2014)
  • R H Azooz et al.

    Soil infiltration and hydraulic conductivity under long-term no-tillage and conventional tillage systems

    Can J Soil Sci

    (1996)
  • R H Azooz et al.

    Soil water drying and recharge rates as affected by tillage under continuous barley and barley-canola cropping systems in northwestern Canada

    Can J Soil Sci

    (2001)
  • B C Ball et al.

    Gas diffusion, fluid flow and derived pore continuity indices in relation to vehicle traffic and tillage

    Eur J Soil Sci

    (1988)
  • H Blanco-Canqui et al.

    Addition of cover crops enhances no-till potential for improving soil physical properties

    Soil Sci Soc Am J

    (2011)
  • S A Brandt

    Zero vs. conventional tillage and their effects on crop yield and soil moisture

    Can J Plant Sci

    (1992)
  • Cited by (92)

    • Indicators of water use efficiency across diverse agroecosystems and spatiotemporal scales

      2023, Science of the Total Environment
      Citation Excerpt :

      Such information is important when comparing potential ecosystem services of different crops or production systems. Another challenge in calculating biomass/grain yield WUE is the inclusion of non-cash crops, such as cover crops, as these affect consumptive water use and storage (Unger and Vigil, 1998), but can have additional ecosystem service benefits (Haruna et al., 2018). In addition, fallow periods must be accounted for in rainfed areas that utilize fallow periods to leave soil moisture for the cash crop.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text