Elsevier

Pedosphere

Volume 26, Issue 4, August 2016, Pages 417-430
Pedosphere

Pedotransfer Functions for Estimating Soil Hydraulic Properties: A Review

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(15)60054-6Get rights and content

Abstract

Characterization of soil hydraulic properties is important to environment management; however, it is well recognized that it is laborious, time-consuming and expensive to directly measure soil hydraulic properties. This paper reviews the development of pedotransfer functions (PTFs) used as an alternative tool to estimate soil hydraulic properties during the last two decades. Modern soil survey techniques like satellite imagery/remote sensing has been used in developing PTFs. Compared to mechanistic approaches, empirical relationships between physical properties and hydraulic properties have received wide preference for predicting soil hydraulic properties. Many PTFs based on different parametric functions can be found in the literature. A number of researchers have pursued a universal function that can describe water retention characteristics of all types of soils, but no single function can be termed generic though van Genuchten (VG) function has been the most widely adopted. Most of the reported parametric PTFs focus on estimation of VG parameters to obtain water retention curve (WRC). A number of physical, morphological and chemical properties have been used as predictor variables in PTFs. Conventionally, regression algorithms/techniques (statistical/neural regression) have been used for calibrating PTFs. However, there are reports of utilizing data mining techniques, e.g., pattern recognition and genetic algorithm. It is inferred that it is critical to refine the data used for calibration to improve the accuracy and reliability of the PTFs. Many statistical indices, including root mean square error (RMSE), index of agreement (d), maximum absolute error (ME), mean absolute error (MAE), coefficient of determination (r2) and correlation coefficient (r), have been used by different researchers to evaluate and validate PTFs. It is argued that being location specific, research interest in PTFs will continue till generic PTFs are developed and validated. In future studies, improved methods will be required to extract information from the existing database.

References (84)

  • B Minasny et al.

    Regression rules as a tool for predicting soil properties from infrared reflectance spectroscopy

    Chemometr Intell Lab Syst

    (2008)
  • B Minasny et al.

    Predicting soil properties in the tropics

    Earth-Sci Rev

    (2011)
  • W J Rawls et al.

    Testing soil water retention estimation with the MUUF pedotransfer model using data from the southern United States

    J Hydrol

    (2001)
  • N Romano et al.

    Prediction of soil water retention using soil physical data and terrain attributes

    J Hydrol

    (2002)
  • O Salazar et al.

    Evaluation of DRAIN-MOD using saturated hydraulic conductivity estimated by a pedotransfer function model

    Agr Water Manage

    (2008)
  • M G Schaap et al.

    ROSETTA: a computer program for estimating soil hydraulic parameters with hierarchical pedotransfer functions

    J Hydrol

    (2001)
  • F Ungaro et al.

    Using existing soil databases for estimating retention properties for soils of the Pinaura Padano-Veneta region of North Italy

    Geoderma

    (2001)
  • M van den Berg et al.

    Pedotransfer functions for the estimation of moisture retention characteristics of Ferralsols and related soils

    Geoderma

    (1997)
  • B Wagner et al.

    Evaluation of pedo-transfer functions for unsaturated soil hydraulic conductivity using an independent data set

    Geoderma

    (2001)
  • J H M Wösten et al.

    Comparison of class and continuous pedotransfer functions to generate soil hydraulic characteristics

    Geoderma

    (1995)
  • J H M Wösten et al.

    Development and use of a database of hydraulic properties of European soils

    Geoderma

    (1999)
  • J H M Wösten et al.

    Pedotransfer functions: bridging the gap between available basic soil data and missing soil hydraulic characteristics

    J Hydrol

    (2001)
  • L R Ahuja et al.

    Estimating soil water characteristics from simpler properties or limited data

    Soil Sci Soc Am J

    (1985)
  • P O Aina et al.

    Estimating available water-holding capacity of western Nigerian soils from soil texture and bulk density, using core and sieved samples

    Soil Sci Soc Am J

    (1985)
  • C Alvarez-Acosta et al.

    Test of the Rosetta pedotransfer function for saturated hydraulic conductivity

    Open J Soil Sci

    (2012)
  • F B Arruda et al.

    Parámetros de solo para o càlculo da àgua disponível com base na textura do solo)

    Rev Bras Ci Solo (in Spanish)

    (1987)
  • L M Arya et al.

    Scaling parameter to predict the soil water characteristic from particle-size distribution data

    Soil Sci Soc Am J

    (1999)
  • G W Bloemen

    Calculation of hydraulic conductivities of soil from texture and organic matter content

    Z Pflanzenernähr Bodenk (in German)

    (1980)
  • J Bouma

    Using soil survey data for quantitative land evaluation

    Adv Soil Sci

    (1989)
  • R H Brooks et al.

    Properties of porous media affecting fluid flow

    J Irrig Drain Div

    (1966)
  • A Bruand et al.

    Prediction of water retention properties of clayey soils: validity of relationships using a single soil characteristic

    Soil Use Manage

    (1994)
  • G S Campbell et al.

    Prediction of hydraulic properties of soils using particle-size distribution and bulk density data

  • G S Campbell

    A simple method for determining unsaturated conductivity from moisture retention data

    Soil Sci

    (1974)
  • A Canarache

    Physical-technological maps. A possible product of soil survey for direct use in agriculture

    Soil Technol

    (1993)
  • P Carman

    Fluid flow through a granular bed

    Trans Inst Chem Eng

    (1937)
  • P Carman

    Flow of gases through porous media

    (1956)
  • C Chen et al.

    Measured and modeled unsaturated hydraulic conductivity of a Walla Walla silt loam

    Soil Sci Soc Am J

    (2001)
  • P M Driessen

    The water balance of the soil

  • D A Farrel et al.

    Modeling the pore structure of porous media

    Water Resour Res

    (1972)
  • F Gérard et al.

    Preferential flow revealed by hydrologic modeling based on predicted hydraulic properties

    Soil Sci Soc Am J

    (2004)
  • A K Guber et al.

    Multimodeling with Pedotransfer Functions

  • S C Gupta et al.

    Estimating soil water retention characteristics from particle size distribution, organic matter percent, and bulk density

    Water Resour Res

    (1979)
  • Cited by (113)

    • Organization of the soil profile controls the risks of runoff in the humid Ethiopian Highlands

      2023, Journal of Hydrology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Two instruments were used to develop the WRCs at University of California, Berkeley: the Hyprop instrument and the WP4C dew point potential meter. The Hyprop uses an evaporation method with precision tensiometers (Schindler, 1980; Peters and Durner, 2008; Schindler et al., 2010b,a) to measure soil water potential, and soil volumetric water content is determined from gravimetric water content. Following the Hyprop measurements, we took 7 ml disturbed soil from the intact soil samples for use in the WP4C instrument and measurements of the dry end of the water retention curve.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text