Elsevier

Pedosphere

Volume 17, Issue 5, October 2007, Pages 624-629
Pedosphere

Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal with P seudomonas putida GM6 from Activated Sludge

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(07)60074-5Get rights and content

Abstract

The enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) method is widely adopted for phosphorus removal from waste-water, yet little is known about its microbiological and molecular mechanisms. Therefore, it is difficult to predict and control the deterioration of the EBPR process in a large-scale municipal sewage treatment plant. This study used a novel strain isolated in the laboratory, Pseudomonas putida GM6, which had a high phosphate accumulating ability and could recover rapidly from the deteriorated system and enhance the capability of phosphorus removal in activated sludge. Strain GM6 marked with gfp gene, which was called GMTR, was delivered into a bench-scale sequencing batch reactor (SBR) of low efficiency, to investigate the colonization of GMTR and removal of phosphorus. After 21 days, the proportion of GMTR in the total bacteria of the sludge reached 9.2%, whereas the phosphorus removal rate was 96%, with an effluent concentration of about 0.2 mg L−1. In the reactor with the addition of GMTR, phosphorus was removed quickly, in 1 h under anaerobic conditions, and in 2 h under aerobic conditions. These evidences were characteristic of EBPR processes. Field testing was conducted at a hospital sewage treatment facility with low phosphorus removal capability. Twenty- one days after Pseudomonas putida GM6 was added, effluent phosphorus concentration remained around 0.3 mg L−1, corresponding to a removal rate of 96.8%. It was therefore demonstrated that Pseudomonas putida GM6couldbeused for a quick startup and enhancement of wastewater biological phosphorus removal, which provided a scientific basis for potential large-scale engineering application.

References (20)

  • M. Maurer et al.

    Intracellular carbon flow in phosphorus accumulating organisms from activated sludge systems

    Wat. Res.

    (1997)
  • L.S. Serafim et al.

    Methods for detection and visualization of intracellular polymers stored by polyphosphate-accumulating microorganisms

    J. Microbiol. Meth.

    (2002)
  • R.J. Seviour et al.

    The microbiology of biological phosphorus removal in activated sludge systems

    FEMS Microbiol. Rev.

    (2003)
  • J. Ahn et al.

    Ecology of the microbial community removing phosphate from wastewater under continuously aerobic conditions in a sequencing batch reactor

    Appl. Environ. Microbiol.

    (2007)
  • M. Beer et al.

    Which are the polyphosphate accumulating organisms in full-scale activated sludge enhanced biological phosphate removal systems in Australia?

    J. Appl. Microbiol.

    (2006)
  • T.M. Cai et al.

    Isolation and characterization of strain GM1 with high capability of accumulating poly-P

    Acta Pedologica Sinica

    (2005)
  • M.H. Daioema et al.

    The accumulation of polyphosphate in Acinetobacter spp

    FEMS Microbiol. Lett.

    (1980)
  • M.H. Daioema et al.

    Some physiological characteristics of Acinetobacter spp. accumulating large amounts of phosphate

    Water Sci. Technol.

    (1985)
  • G.W. Fuhs et al.

    Microbiological basis of phosphate removal in the activated sludge process for the treatment of wastewater

    Microb. Ecol.

    (1975)
  • L.G. Leff et al.

    Use of green fluorescent protein to monitor survival of genetically engineered bacteria in aquatic environments

    Appl. Environ. Microbiol.

    (1996)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (21)

  • Nutrient removal from domestic wastewater: A comprehensive review on conventional and advanced technologies

    2021, Journal of Environmental Management
    Citation Excerpt :

    The extent of denitrifying phosphorus uptake depends on the nitrate load, that is, if the nitrate load exceeds the denitrification potential of OHOs, then only significant denitrifying phosphorus uptake would be mostly observed (Hu et al., 2002). Of late, significant progress has been made in the isolation of DPAOs from the genera Acinetobacter (Kishida et al., 2006), Pseudomonas (Tian-Ming et al., 2007), Aeromonas (Wang et al., 2008), Bacillus (Ma et al., 2011), Planctomycetes (Liu et al., 2009), Paracoccus (Liu and Li, 2015), Candidatus (Nguyen et al., 2011, 2012; Zeng et al., 2016) . Denitrifying phosphorus removal has gained pronounced attention in the recent past, as it demonstrates certain improvements over EBPR methods.

  • Phosphorus and nitrogen removal by a novel phosphate-accumulating organism, Arthrobacter sp. HHEP5 capable of heterotrophic nitrification-aerobic denitrification: Safety assessment, removal characterization, mechanism exploration and wastewater treatment

    2020, Bioresource Technology
    Citation Excerpt :

    However, due to the unknown P removal abilities of the enriched PAOs, EBPR system frequently fails to operate reliably with poor P removal efficiency (Seviour et al., 2003). And adding efficient PAOs could be fundamentally helpful to the stable and efficient operation of EBPR, shortening the adaptation time and vastly increasing the P removal efficiency (Li et al., 2012; Cai et al., 2007). While, till now, most studies focus on the process improvement or microbial analysis of EBPR system and overlook the acquisition or application of PAOs (Seviour et al., 2003), resulting in extremely rare numbers or species of PAOs and hindering the efficient P removal of EBPR system.

  • Removal of low concentration of phosphorus from solution by free and immobilized cells of Pseudomonas stutzeri YG-24

    2012, Desalination
    Citation Excerpt :

    Many studies have reported that Accumulibacter was present in relative abundance (4–22% of all bacteria) in full-scale sludge, and was concluded to be an important organism contributing to P removal in EBPR plants [7]. Acinetobacter, Micrococcus and Pseudomonas species have also been considered as members of microorganisms in EBPR [8] and pure PAO strains have been introduced into the P removal from water [4,9–11]. Pure PAOs showed some advantages in P removal, such as a shorter time for adaptation than the EBPR system [4] and they could be used as immobilized cells suitable for industrial application [12,13].

View all citing articles on Scopus

Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 30500010 and 50308011).

View full text