Elsevier

Pedosphere

Volume 16, Issue 5, October 2006, Pages 572-578
Pedosphere

Catalysis of Dissolved and Adsorbed Iron in Soil Suspension for Chromium(VI) Reduction by Sulfide

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(06)60090-8Get rights and content

ABSTRACT

The kinetics of Cr(VI) reduction by sulfide in soil suspensions with various pHs, soil compositions, and Fe(II) concentrations was examined using batch anaerobic experimental systems at constant temperature. The results showed that the reaction rate of Cr(VI) reduction was in the order of red soil < yellow-brown soil < chernozem and was proportional to the concentration of HCl-extractable iron in the soils. Dissolved and adsorbed iron in soil suspensions played an important role in accelerating Cr(VI) reduction. The reaction involved in the Cr(VI) reduction by Fe(II) to produce Fe(III), which was reduced to Fe(II) again by sulfide, could represent the catalytic pathway until about 70% of the initially present Cr(VI) was reduced. The catalysis occurred because the one-step reduction of Cr(VI) by sulfide was slower than the two-step process consisting of rapid Cr(VI) reduction by Fe(II) followed by Fe(III) reduction by sulfide. In essence, Fe(II)/Fe(III) species shuttle electrons from sulfide to Cr(VI), facilitating the reaction. The effect of iron, however, could be completely blocked by adding a strong Fe(II)-complexing ligand, 1,10-phenanthroline, to the soil suspensions. In all the experiments, initial sulfide concentration was much higher than initial Cr(VI) concentration. The plots of In c[Cr(VI)] versus reaction time were linear up to approximately 70% of Cr(VI) reduction, suggesting a first-order reaction kinetics with respect to Cr(VI). Elemental sulfur, the product of sulfide oxidation, was found to accelerate Cr(VI) reduction at a later stage of the reaction, resulting in deviation from linearity for the In c[Cr(VI)] versus time plots.

REFERENCES (28)

  • L.E. Eary et al.

    Chromate removal from aqueous wastes by reduction with ferrous ion

    Environ. Sci. Technol.

    (1988)
  • L.E. Eary et al.

    Kinetics of chromate reduction by ferrous ions derived from hematite and biotite at 25 °C

    American Journal of Science

    (1989)
  • L.E. Eary et al.

    Chromate reduction by subsurface soils under acidic conditions

    Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.

    (1991)
  • M.S. Elovitz et al.

    Redox interactions of Cr(VI) and substituted phenols: Kinetic investigation

    Environ. Sci, Technol.

    (1994)
  • Cited by (40)

    • Roles of natural iron oxides in the promoted sequestration of chromate using calcium polysulfide: pH effect and mechanisms

      2020, Separation and Purification Technology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Therefore, understanding the role of iron oxides in Cr(VI) sequestration using CPS is of great environmental significance, yet this process is poorly understood. Goethite, illite, schwertmannite and jarosite can accelerate Cr(VI) reduction by dissolved sulfide [35–39]. Chrysochoou and Johnston [2] showed reduction of Cr(VI) in soil using CPS at a two-fold stoichiometric ratio of CPS-to-Cr(VI) reached the equilibrium at 30 days with no available sulfur-bearing Cr(VI) reductants.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text