Pedosphere 34(4): 797--813, 2024
ISSN 1002-0160/CN 32-1315/P
©2024 Soil Science Society of China
Published by Elsevier B.V. and Science Press
Assessment of SoilGrids data for soil erosion estimation at watershed scale: A case study in northern Thailand
Chike Onyeka MADUEKE1,3, Dhruba Pikha SHRESTHA2, Panagiotis NYKTAS1
1 Department of Natural Resources, Faculty of Geo-information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), University of Twente, Enschede 7500 AE (the Netherlands);
2 Department of Applied Earth Sciences, Faculty of Geo-information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), University of Twente, Enschede 7500 AE (the Netherlands);
3 Department of Soil Science and Land Resources Management, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, P. M. B. 5025, Awka, Anambra State 420110 (Nigeria)
Corresponding Author:Chike Onyeka MADUEKE
ABSTRACT
      Soil erosion has been identified as one of the most destructive forms of land degradation, posing a threat to the sustainability of global economic, social and environmental systems. This underscores the need for sustainable land management that takes erosion control and prevention into consideration. This requires the use of state-of-the-art erosion prediction models. The models often require extensive input of detailed spatial and temporal data, some of which are not readily available in many developing countries, particularly detailed soil data. The soil dataset Global Gridded Soil Information (SoilGrids) could potentially fill the data gap. Nevertheless, its value and accuracy for soil erosion modelling in the humid tropics is still unknown, necessitating the need to assess its value vis-à-vis field-based data. The major objective of this study was to conduct a comparative assessment of the value of SoilGrids and field-based soil data for estimating soil loss. Soil samples were collected from five physiographic positions (summit, shoulder, back slope, foot slope, and toe slope) using the soil catena approach. Samples were collected using a 5-cm steel sample ring (undisturbed) and a spade (disturbed). Data of the landform, predominant vegetation types, canopy cover, average plant height, land use, soil depth, shear strength, and soil color were recorded for each site. The soil samples were subjected to laboratory analysis for saturated hydraulic conductivity, bulk density, particle size distribution, and organic matter content. Pedotransfer functions were applied on the SoilGrids and field-based data to generate soil hydrological properties. The resultant field-based data were compared with the SoilGrids data for corresponding points/areas to determine the potential similarities of the two datasets. Both datasets were then used as inputs for soil erosion assessment using the revised Morgan-Morgan-Finney model. The results from both datasets were again compared to determine the degree of similarity. The results showed that with respect to point-based comparison, both datasets were significantly different. At the hillslope delineation level, the field-based data still consistently had a greater degree of variability, but the hillslope averages were not significantly different for both datasets. Similar results were recorded with the soil loss parameters generated from both datasets; point-based comparison showed that both datasets were significantly different, whereas the reverse was true for parcel/area-based comparison. SoilGrids data are certainly useful, especially where soil data are lacking; the utility of this dataset is, however, dependent on the scale of operation or the extent of detail required. When detailed, site-specific data are required, SoilGrids may not be a good alternative to soil survey data in the humid tropics. On the other hand, if the average soil properties of a region, area, or land parcel are required for the implementation of a particular project, plan, or program, SoilGrids data can be a very valuable alternative to soil survey data.
Key Words:  hillslope modelling,pedotransfer function,similarity assessment,soil erosion modelling,soil loss,soil survey
Citation: Madueke C O, Shrestha D P, Nyktas P. 2024. Assessment of SoilGrids data for soil erosion estimation at watershed scale: A case study in northern Thailand. Pedosphere. 34(4): 797–813.
View Full Text



版权所有 © 2024 《PEDOSPHERE》(土壤圈)编委会
地址:江苏南京市江宁区麒麟街道创优路298号 中科院南京土壤研究所 邮编:211135    E-mail:pedosphere@issas.ac.cn
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号