Elsevier

Pedosphere

Volume 31, Issue 4, August 2021, Pages 645-657
Pedosphere

Stabilization of chromium(VI) by hydroxysulfate green rust in chromium(VI)-contaminated soils

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(21)60009-7Get rights and content

Abstract

Chromium (Cr)-contaminated soils pose a great environmental risk, with high solubility and persistent leaching of Cr(VI). In this study, hydroxysulfate green rust (GRSO4), with the general formula Fe(II)4Fe(III)2(OH)12SO4·8H2O, was evaluated for its efficiency in Cr(VI) stabilization via Cr(VI) reduction to Cr(III) in four representative Cr(VI)-spiked soils. The initial concentrations of phosphate buffer-extractable Cr(VI) (Cr(VI)b) in soils 1, 2, 3, and 4 were 382.4, 575.9, 551.3, and 483.7 mg kg–1, respectively. Reduction of Cr(VI) to Cr(III) by structural Fe(II) (Fe(II)s) in GRSO4 in all studied soils was fast, wherein the application of GRSO4 markedly decreased the amount of Cr(VI)b at the Cr(VI)b/Fe(II)s stoichiometric mole ratio of 0.33. The kinetics of Cr(VI) reduction by GRSO4 could not be determined as this reaction coincided with the release of Cr(VI) from soil during the experiment. The concentration of Cr(VI)b decreased, as the Cr(VI)b/Fe(II)s ratio decreased from 0.46 to 0.20, generally to below 10 mg kg–1. Back-transformation of the generated Cr(III) was examined in the presence of manganese oxide birnessite at the birnessite/initial Cr(III) mole ratio of 4.5. The results of batch tests showed that only 5.2% of the initial Cr(III) was converted to Cr(VI) after two months, while under field capacity moisture conditions, less than 0.05% of the initial Cr(III) was oxidized to Cr(VI) after six months. The results illustrated that remediation of Cr(VI)-contaminated soils would be fast, successful, and irreversible with an appropriate quantity of fresh GRSO4.

References (67)

  • L C Hsu et al.

    Comparison of the spectroscopic speciation and chemical fractionation of chromium in contaminated paddy soils

    J Hazard Mater

    (2015)
  • I Ikemoto et al.

    X-ray photoelectron spectroscopic studies of CrO2 and some related chromium compounds

    J Solid State Chem

    (1976)
  • J Jiang et al.

    The mechanism of chromate sorption by three variable charge soils

    Chemosphere

    (2008)
  • J Kotaś et al.

    Chromium occurrence in the environment and methods of its speciation

    Environ Pollut

    (2000)
  • Y J Li et al.

    Remediation of hexavalent chromium spiked soil by using synthesized iron sulfide particles

    Chemosphere

    (2017)
  • X L Liu et al.

    Effects of citrate on hexavalent chromium reduction by structural Fe(II) in nontronite

    J Hazard Mater

    (2018)
  • D H Moon et al.

    Evaluation of the treatment of chromite ore processing residue by ferrous sulfate and asphalt

    J Hazard Mater

    (2009)
  • P H Refait et al.

    Mechanisms of formation and structure of green rust one in aqueous corrosion of iron in the presence of chloride ions

    Corros Sci

    (1998)
  • C Ruby et al.

    Coprecipitation of Fe(II) and Fe(III) cations in sulphated aqueous medium and formation of hydroxysulphate green rust

    Solid State Sci

    (2003)
  • C Ruby et al.

    Synthesis and transformation of iron-based layered double hydroxides

    Appl Clay Sci

    (2010)
  • M Shahid et al.

    Chromium speciation, bioavailability, uptake, toxicity and detoxification in soil-plant system: A review

    Chemosphere

    (2017)
  • L L Skovbjerg et al.

    The mechanisms of reduction of hexavalent chromium by green rust sodium sulphate: Formation of Cr-goethite

    Geochim Cosmochim Acta

    (2006)
  • J Sun et al.

    Fe(III) photocatalytic reduction of Cr(VI) by low-molecular-weight organic acids with α-OH

    J Hazard Mater

    (2009)
  • V Veselská et al.

    Chromate adsorption on selected soil minerals: Surface complexation modeling coupled with spectroscopic investigation

    J Hazard Mater

    (2016)
  • T Wang et al.

    In-situ remediation of hexavalent chromium contaminated groundwater and saturated soil using stabilized iron sulfide nanoparticles

    J Environ Manag

    (2019)
  • T Yamashita et al.

    Analysis of XPS spectra of Fe2+ and Fe3+ ions in oxide materials

    Appl Surf Sci

    (2008)
  • S T Aldmour et al.

    Abiotic reduction of Cr(VI) by humic acids derived from peat and lignite: Kinetics and removal mechanism

    Environ Sci Pollut Res

    (2019)
  • L Alidokht et al.

    Removal of chromate from aqueous solution by reduction with nanoscale Fe–Al layered double hydroxide

    Res Chem Intermed

    (2018)
  • R Bartlett et al.

    Behavior of chromium in soils: III. Oxidation

    J Environ Qual

    (1979)
  • D L Bond et al.

    Kinetics and structural constraints of chromate reduction by green rusts

    Environ Sci Technol

    (2003)
  • C A Bower et al.

    Exchangeable cation analysis of saline and alkali soils

    Soil Sci

    (1952)
  • B D Cullity

    Elements of X-ray Diffraction

    (1978)
  • D Dermatas et al.

    Ettringite-induced heave in chromite ore processing residue (COPR) upon ferrous sulfate treatment

    Environ Sci Technol

    (2006)
  • Cited by (10)

    • Influence of citrate/tartrate on chromite crystallization behavior and its potential environmental implications

      2023, Journal of Hazardous Materials
      Citation Excerpt :

      Therefore, harmless treatment and resource utilization of chromium pollution has received much attention. Chromium ion usually exists in either Cr(VI) or Cr(III) (Alidokht et al., 2021; Ding et al., 2022). Specifically, Cr(VI) usually exists in the form of HCrO4−, CrO42−, and Cr2O72−, and has a high solubility in water, which makes the Cr(VI) unstable in the environment (Ding et al., 2022; Brasili et al., 2020).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text