Elsevier

Pedosphere

Volume 27, Issue 4, August 2017, Pages 681-693
Pedosphere

Mapping Soil Organic Carbon Using Local Terrain Attributes: A Comparison of Different Polynomial Models

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(17)60445-4Get rights and content

Abstract

Local terrain attributes, which are derived directly from the digital elevation model, have been widely applied in digital soil mapping. This study aimed to evaluate the mapping accuracy of soil organic carbon (SOC) concentration in 2 zones of the Heihe River in China, by combining prediction methods with local terrain attributes derived from different polynomial models. The prediction accuracy was used as a benchmark for those who may be more concerned with how accurately the variability of soil properties is modeled in practice, rather than how morphometric variables and their geomorphologic interpretations are understood and calculated. In this study, 2 neighborhood types (square and circular) and 6 representative algorithms (Evans-Young, Horn, Zevenbergen-Thorne, Shary, Shi, and Florinsky algorithms) were applied. In general, 35 combinations of first- and second-order derivatives were produced as candidate predictors for soil mapping using two mapping methods (i.e., kriging with an external drift and geographically weighted regression). The results showed that appropriate local terrain attribute algorithms could better capture the spatial variation of SOC concentration in a region where soil properties are strongly influenced by the topography. Among the different combinations of first- and second-order derivatives used, there was a best combination with a more accurate estimate. For different prediction methods, the relative improvement in the two zones varied between 0.30% and 9.68%. The SOC maps resulting from the higher-order algorithms (Zevenbergen-Thorne and Florinsky) yielded less interpolation errors. Therefore, it was concluded that the performance of predictive methods, which incorporated auxiliary variables, could be improved by attempting different terrain analysis algorithms.

References (46)

  • P A Shary et al.

    Fundamental quantitative methods of land surface analysis

    Geoderma

    (2002)
  • X Shi et al.

    A comparison of LiDAR-based DEMs and USGS-sourced DEMs in terrain analysis for knowledge-based digital soil mapping

    Geoderma

    (2012)
  • M P Smith et al.

    The effects of DEM resolution and neighborhood size on digital soil survey

    Geoderma

    (2006)
  • C M Wang et al.

    Influence of resolution on slope in areas with different topographic characteristics

    Comput Geosci

    (2012)
  • X F Wang et al.

    Vegetation primary production estimation at maize and alpine meadow over the Heihe River Basin, China

    Int J Appl Earth Observ Geoinform

    (2012)
  • S D Warren et al.

    An evaluation of methods to determine slope using digital elevation data

    Catena

    (2004)
  • J P Wilson

    Digital terrain modeling

    Geomorphology

    (2012)
  • F Yimer et al.

    Soil property variations in relation to topographic aspect and vegetation community in the south-eastern highlands of Ethiopia

    For Ecol Manag

    (2006)
  • Q M Zhou et al.

    Analysis of errors of derived slope and aspect related to DEM data properties

    Comput Geosci

    (2004)
  • M B Bodaghabadi et al.

    Using Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA) to identify the most important DEM attributes for digital soil mapping applications

    Catena

    (2011)
  • D B Duncan

    Multiple range and multiple F tests

    Biometrics

    (1955)
  • R H Erskine et al.

    Digital elevation accuracy and grid cell size: effects on estimated terrain attributes

    Soil Sci Soc Am J

    (2007)
  • I S Evans

    An integrated system of terrain analysis and slope mapping

    Zeitschr Geomorphol

    (1980)
  • Cited by (17)

    • Application of a combinatorial approach for soil organic carbon mapping in hills

      2021, Journal of Environmental Management
      Citation Excerpt :

      Second, the hilly area was divided into different terrain zones according to the different connections between the LS residuals and local factors (topographic and vegetation factors). This makes it feasible to accurately determine the varying relationships between SOC and local factors (Li et al., 2013; Wiaux et al., 2014; Song et al., 2017) and is also an important reason for the higher performance of LS_RBF_HASM compared to LS_HASM. Third, the RBF model has excellent capability to capture the complex relationships between SOC and LS residuals within different local terrain than MLR, and this led LS_RBF_HASM performance better than LS_MLR_HASM although they incorporated the same auxiliary environmental variables.

    • Effects of neighborhood analysis window forms and derivative algorithms on the soil aggregate stability – Landscape modeling

      2021, Catena
      Citation Excerpt :

      In this regard, A-Xing et al. (2008) demonstrated that the accuracy of DSM is strongly related to the neighborhood size applied to calculate terrain attributes. Xiaodong et al. (2017) also showed that appropriate terrain attribute algorithms could improve the digital mapping accuracy of soil organic carbon. The results of this study showed that the curvature attributes were more sensitive to the type of calculation patterns than the slope attributes.

    • Combining geomorphometry, feature extraction techniques and Earth-surface processes research: The way forward

      2020, Geomorphology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The lower resolution DEM (Fig. 9j) presents vagueness in the valley. Comparative studies in various discipline, ranging from hydrology (Buchanan et al., 2014; Sørensen et al., 2006), natural hazard (Barbarella et al., 2017; Favalli and Fornaciai, 2017; Mahalingam and Olsen, 2016), geomorphometry (Purinton and Bookhagen, 2017; Sofia et al., 2014a), watershed analysis (Liffner et al., 2018), soil science (Song et al., 2017; Song et al., 2016) proves that a calculation method that performs best for all measured variables does not exist; rather the best methods is generally variable, site-specific and specific to each field-of-study. We can think of geomorphometry as a research that is bridging two very different timescales: that of much longer landform evolution, and that based upon measurement using specially designed instrumentation.

    • Digital soil mapping algorithms and covariates for soil organic carbon mapping and their implications: A review

      2019, Geoderma
      Citation Excerpt :

      Parameters that can be derived from DEM have also been widely used in DSM. Song et al. (2017a) compared the predictive performance of first-order terrain derivatives such as slope and aspect with second-order derivatives including various measures of terrain curvature. In comparison to lower order terrain parameters, higher order terrain parameters derived from the DEM were found to yield moderately smaller prediction errors, which may be due to the local de-noising in comparison to lower order terrain parameters.

    • Multinomial logistic regression with soil diagnostic features and land surface parameters for soil mapping of Latium (Central Italy)

      2019, Geoderma
      Citation Excerpt :

      The appropriate resolution of a DEM will depend on the scale of the processes controlling soil formation and this will be strongly landscape dependent (McKenzie and Ryan, 1999). More recently, Ließ et al. (2012) produced digital soil maps of thickness and occurrence probability of a soil diagnostic horizon using classification and regression trees; Vågen et al. (2016) developed prediction models for mapping soil functional properties relying on the spectral properties of individual MODIS pixels; Song et al. (2017) combined prediction methods with local terrain attributes to improve their prediction performance for DSM of soil organic carbon. Land components (LCs, also called landform elements, terrain units or land surface segments) are often used as land units, mainly because their boundaries frequently coincide with transitions in environmental land properties (MacMillan et al., 2004).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text